Outsourcing Policy

Outsourcing policies vary greatly among nations and
firms. Policy makers take a number of effects into account when
making their policies (see theory).
Pro-Outsourcing Policy Considerations:
- Globalization: Outsourcing increases globalization
and opens trade, which is beneficial to all parties by reducing costs
and increasing productivity.
- Economic Growth: Outsourcing causes economies to grow
due to increased productivity and globalization. New jobs are
created to fit the growing economy.
- Employment: Many worry that pro-outsourcing
policies
reduce the number of jobs available to domestic workers. But, a
job gained overseas doesn't always mean a job lost at home. The
growing domestic economy will demand more workers. Additionally,
the major pro-outsourcing countries (U.S. and Britian) already have
large job turn-over rates and are near full employment. Jobs lost
do to outsourcing are fairly neglegable since they are reallocated in
the economy.
Figure One: Top
reasons for outsourcing according to Michael F. Corbett &
Associates. The reduction of costs is one of the most significant
reasons for outsourcing.
Anti-Outsourcing Policy Considerations
- Globalization: Globalization has negatively
impacted the world. Workers in smaller countries have been
exploited by the growth of outsourcing in the global
economy. Outsourcing has created concerns regarding social
justice and the fair treatment of workers.
- Economic Growth: The outsourcing of jobs has
destroyed local economies. As low wage workers attract jobs away
from prominent local industires, workers within these industries are
left without their jobs. Towns that rely upon these industries
are therefore permenently crippled as their economy is stiffled.
- Employment: Unemployment within outsourced sectors
becomes rampant. This provides a negative effect on local
workers who relied upon these industries for employment. Jobs may
be reallocated but not immediatly. As jobs are lost new jobs are
not made immediatlly accessible.
U.S. Policy: Bush vs. Kerry
Bush Administration:
From the beginning, this administration has had strong free-trade and
pro-outsourcing stances, citing its ability to increase efficiency and
productivity. Bush's policy believes that outsourcing is a positive
transaction that will enrich the US economy in the long-run, even if it causes short-run
pain and dislocation for those whose jobs are outsourced. N. Gregory
Mankiw, chairman of Bush's Counicl of Economic Advisors expressed
this point of view saying, "Outsourcing is just a new way of doing
international trade."
Kerry and Democratic Viewpoint:
During his campaign for presidency, Kerry took a some-what
anti-outsourcing stance, proposing a change in tax laws so U.S. companies
have less incentive to move operations overseas. A Kerry trade advisor,
Ms. Lael Brainard was quoted as saying, "John Kerry doesn't want to end
outsourcing. But he wants to end the kind of outsourcing that results
from distortions in the tax code." It is also important to note that
during his Senate history, the majority of the time Kerry has voted in favor of free-trade and outsourcing.
|
Sources
~www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/
articles/A6661-2004Sep8.html
~www.postgazette.com/pg/04041/
271362.stm
~techpolicy.typepad.com/tpp/2004/
09/bush_kerry_html
~www.anti-marketing.com
~www.globalizethis.org
~"Economist Article Shows Outsourching's Bright Side." Office Pro. March 2005, Vol. 65 Issue 2, pg. 7. Accessed on-line 9 May 2005.
~Parry, Robert T. "Globalization: Threat or Opportunity for the U. S. Economy." FRBSF Ecnomic Letter. Honolulu. 29 April 2004. Accessed on-line 9 May 2005.
~www.soulinteractive.nl/...outsourcing.html
|